Showing posts with label Amazon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amazon. Show all posts

Oct 7, 2013

Rainn Wilson Says Amazon’s New Kindle Commercial Looks Too Familiar

As consumer tech commercials go, Amazon’s newest spot for its Kindle line isn’t that exciting. Like most Amazon consumer tech commercials, it is light on sizzle, heavy on people describing the product’s specs and features.
This time, the people doing the talking are supposedly “real people,” sitting on a couch in front of New York’s Flatiron building.

No big deal, right? Not so, says actor Rainn Wilson, who you know as Dwight from NBC’s “The Office.”
Wilson is also one of the guys behind “SoulPancake,” a not-so-easy-to-describe “platform” for discussion about spirituality and positivity and creativity and stuff. They have a (Google-funded) YouTube channel, too. And Wilson says Amazon based its commercial on one of their videos:

I’ve (sort of sheepishly) asked the Amazon folks for comment. I assume they’ll get back to me right after they finish up that press release which details exactly how many Kindles they’ve sold to date.
In the meantime, some not-very-involved sleuthing will turn up other examples of people who have filmed people sitting on couches on the street.
Last year, someone named Kristian Reimer, for instance, produced four of these. Though it’s possible that the Amazon folks or their ad agency never saw them, because they appear to have generated less than 350 views prior to today.

And, as Josh Bonnar points out, the concept has shown up in commercials before. Here’s one from Kleenex, featuring tears, hugs and a Goo Goo Dollsy soundtrack:


https://dl-web.dropbox.com/get/img/Courtesy_AllThingsD.PNG?w=AADhU-XmFUQBqLAKNzHree-e13TeHVVxDCNGJq8XzHNAWg

Oct 1, 2013

Amazon to deliver 70,000 holiday jobs

Amazon.com CEO Jeff Bezos is going on a hiring binge to keep up with deliveries from the online retail juggernaut.

The electronic commerce pioneer is planning to add more than 70,000 full-time seasonal U.S. jobs. The positions will be located within its fulfillment centers for the holidays and are intended to meet increased seasonal retail demand. The hiring boom for this year's seasonal work is up 40% from a year ago, when the Internet's retail giant hired 50,000 seasonal workers.

Shares of Amazon are up about 24% this year on expectations for continued growth in sales from media, Kindle devices, its online super store, and Web services.
amazon logo
Known for product secrecy, Bezos made a rare media tour to engage the business world on Amazon's bright future. Amazon's founder said that its Publishing and Studios businesses are "just good business in their own right," in an interview with USA TODAY's Ed Baig.

READ MORE: Amazon, Apple face more international taxes in Europe

The Amazon chief said he wouldn't want to spend most of his time as a company pitchman. That's because he appears knee deep at all times in the thick of company product developments as the company eyes expansion. "My very favorite thing is to sit with a product design team and talk about what we're going to do next," Bezos told USA TODAY.

The company says this year it has converted 7,000 jobs from temporary positions to full time ones.

Courtesy: USAtoday

Sep 29, 2013

Author pleads: Please don't buy my new novel on Amazon (Q&A)

Jaime Clarke, a Boston-based author and independent bookstore owner, sends out a public plea for readers to resist buying his new novel from the e-commerce giant.

Author Jaime Clarke's new novel "Vernon Downs" will be available on Amazon in April of next year, but fans and new readers who heed the author's plea can get a copy this December. His only request: Buy "Vernon Downs" straight from the publisher and not from Amazon.
In a Web site aptly named pleasedontbuymybookonamazon.com, Clarke lays out his call to support independent publishing and push back against the aggressive cost-cutting tactics of Amazon that, he says, are great for consumers but detrimental to the livelihood of independent publishing.
Author Jaime Clarke created a Web site asking readers to forgo Amazon to raise support for independent publisher Roundabout Press.
(Credit: Jaime Clarke)
Clarke -- who also published the novel "We're So Famous," edited and co-edited a number of other titles and was a founding editor of the Boston College-published literary magazine Post Road -- is co-owner of an independent bookstore in Boston called Newtonville Books.
"As a bookstore owner, I see small presses come and go -- they usually publish a book or two and then fold after running out of money," Clarke writes. "For many small publishers like Roundabout, Amazon accounts for a large portion of sales, but the publisher realizes very little of the purchase price owing to Amazon's discounting policies."
"Vernon Downs" is published by Roundabout Press, from which readers can preorder the book online. Any royalties on sales received from preordering the book now from Roundabout will go directly to the publisher, Clarke said. In addition, anyone who buys the book from Roundabout can get it shipped to them in December. Amazon can't start selling the book until next April, according to Clark, after "Vernon Downs" has gone through the publishing process to get an official bar code.
We've reached out to Amazon for comment and will update this post when we hear back.
The author's move is just one more chapter in the "Amazon vs. small businesses" battle that has expanded especially with regard to books. In July, US District Court Judge Denise Cote ruled that Apple had conspired with five of the largest publishing companies in the US to fix e-book prices. Resting upon the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, the decision has all but secured Amazon's position as the largest and most successful bookseller for years to come.
Despite the fact that independent bookstores have been making a steady comeback as small businesses rebound in the strengthening economy, three independent East Coast bookstores have filed suit against Amazon and major publishers in an attempt to level the playing field. President Barack Obama even got pulled into the debate after New England Independent Booksellers Association Director Steve Fischer late last month condemned the president for visiting an Amazon warehouse in the wake of the Apple e-book decision.
Newtonville Books, an independent bookstore in the Boston area, that author Jaime Clarke co-owns. Clarke recently published an online plea for readers to buy his new novel from publisher Roundabout Press instead of Amazon.
(Credit: Newtownville Books)
In an interview with CNET on Friday, Clarke laid out his reasoning for why readers should shift support towards independent publishers -- even it if it means slightly higher prices -- and the current issues authors, publishers, and booksellers face in the rising e-book and Amazon era. The following is an edited version of that conversation.
Q: Why would you urge people not to buy books, or at least your book, from Amazon? Is it simply that people should not buy books published from independent publishers on Amazon, or that people should avoid all book buying on Amazon because of what you think it's done to the industry?
Clarke: My campaign to urge interested readers to purchase my novel "Vernon Downs" directly from the publisher is mostly economical, which is to say small, independent publishers like Roundabout Press need all the capital they can lay their hands on.
Unfortunately, most indie publishers rely on Amazon to sell their books, and to quote F. Scott Fitzgerald, the price is high. Indie publishers realize a fraction of the purchase price and are at the mercy of Amazon's discounting policies. As a bookstore owner, my obvious preference is that readers buy books at bookstores, but I know a lot of readers don't live in proximity to a bookstore.
Given Amazon's dominance, where do you see both the e-book market and physical book selling at large in five years time? 
Clarke: Industry numbers have borne out what I suspect all along: The e-book market is the new audio book market. E-books are settling to be about 20 percent of the book market, which is what audio books were in the '80s and early '90s.
"Most indie publishers rely on Amazon to sell their books, and to quote F. Scott Fitzgerald, the price is high."
I actually think e-books might be creating new readers, which isn't a bad thing. But people who love books, love books. And books have been around for 500 years. A bigger threat is whether or not the current generation values the book. They'll be around, but will they be read?
What will happen to independent publishers and bookstores as Amazon's hold continues to solidify?
Clarke: Amazon has done all it's going to do to the industry, I think. It's interesting that Amazon's early ambitions were to be the Walmart of the Internet. Books were incidental to their plans -- books just happened to be sitting in warehouses across the country ready to be shipped. It could easily have been lawn furniture.
Now that Amazon is the Walmart of the Internet, it's clear they want to take on technology service providers like Apple. They seem to be hanging around books and publishing mostly out of spite.
Recent reports are saying that independent bookstores are thriving even in the age of Amazon. Do you find this to be true in your own experience with Newtonville Books, and if it is indeed true, what do you think are the causes of the uptick in interest?
Clarke: My wife and I bought Newtonville Books in 2007, just before the economy collapsed. A number of stores were shed and, in fact, we bought Newtonville because it was going to close.
It's true that the number of new bookstores has increased in the last couple of years, which is likely owing to the improving economy. I think any community that is so inclined can support a small, independent bookstore. The big, warehouse bookstore with deep discounts (for instance, Borders and Barnes & Noble) are dinosaurs and are frankly just trying to replicate physically the Amazon experience.
But if having a neighborhood bookstore is important to the neighborhood, it can be done. Even if it means only buying half your books on Amazon, or one in three. I recently heard [Amazon CEO] Jeff Bezos bragging about how Amazon is a customer-centric company, meaning he doesn't listen to all the criticism about Amazon's shoddy corporate policies, etc. All is in service to giving the customer the lowest price, fast and easy.
"[If] having a neighborhood bookstore is important to the neighborhood, it can be done. Even if means only buying half your books on Amazon."
But I'd argue it's not that customer-centric, especially if the customer's house catches on fire and the fire department can't come because the customer bought all their stuff on Amazon without paying sales tax. Or the customer's kids have to be bused an hour away because the local school had to close because of the loss of tax revenue on all those Amazon sales -- on down the line.
Some individuals claim that Amazon's self-publishing and digital selling tools have removed the barriers for young and upcoming writers to get published. Is this accurate in your eyes?
Clarke: I don't have a lot of experience with that side of Amazon. I'm a populist by nature and so I'm against barriers, especially as it relates to art. Amazon is a marketplace and their terrible corporate policies notwithstanding, they're likely providing a valuable service to the little store in Iowa who has something on their shelves that a customer in New Mexico is desperate for.
That may be true, too, for self-publishing. If so, great. I'm sure all the advantages are really on Amazon's side of the transaction, though. They've never shown themselves to be concerned with art or art-making. Just money.
What is the benefit to literature in having both independent and large publishing houses to help curate and assign value to creative works?
I worked in publishing in the late 1990s and know firsthand that like any big business, publishing is mostly guessing. It drives aspiring authors crazy, but books are mostly published based on the passions of a few people, i.e., the author, the author's agent, and the author's editor.
Though in the last decade or so that circle has widened to include marketing people and others at the publishing house, I suspect. I think that's why there are more and more independent publishers springing up.
What makes the publishing industry different in your opinion from other the institutions around other creative media like music? 
Clarke: The music and movie industries have undergone a dramatic digital revolution, and while the early going was rough, it seems like those industries are adapting well. The difference for books is simply it's a printed medium.
"As a society we have respect for reading so much so that we disparage reading things on our computers as a matter of rote."
We listen to music and don't really care what the delivery system is. Same for movies. We sit and stare but don't really care which format we're staring at. But inherent in the book is the idea of reading, and as a society we have respect for reading so much so that we disparage reading things on our computers as a matter of rote.
We imbue reading with seriousness and revere "People Who Read," which conjures the image of someone spending time with a book. As I say, that reverence could be in jeopardy with the current generation, but we'll have to wait to see.

Courtesy: CNET

Sep 28, 2013

Intel Looking for Help from Amazon or Samsung to Keep Its Web TV Project Alive

Intel executives, who have promised to launch a Web-based pay TV service by the end of 2013, are now looking for a strategic backer to help them fund and distribute the service. If they don’t find one soon, it’s possible the project will be scrapped.
People familiar with Intel’s plans said the company has been talking to both Amazon and Samsung in the hope of keeping the service afloat.
Executives from Amazon and Intel declined to comment; I’m waiting to hear back from Samsung reps. [UPDATE: No comment from Samsung, either.]
Erik Huggers
Erik Huggers
In February, Intel executive Erik Huggers said he planned to start selling an “over the top” pay TV service that would contain a full compliment of broadcast and cable TV networks, by the end of the year.
Other technology players, including Google, Apple and Sony, have pondered a similar service, though none of them have publicly committed to the idea.
But Intel has yet to finalize a deal with a major TV programmer. And new CEO Brian Krzanich, who took over the company in May, has made a point of striking a tentative tone when discussing Intel’s TV ambitions.
“We’re being cautious. We’re experts in silicon, we’re experts in mobility, in driving Moore’s law,” Krzanich said in a June interview. “But we are not experts in the content industry and we’re being careful.”
Intel has more than 300 employees, most of whom it hired from outside the company, working on the TV project under Huggers. And it is currently testing a version of its service, which is supposed to work with an Intel-designed set-top box, with more than 3,000 Intel employees. Intel has planned on marketing the service under a new “OnCue” brand.
OnCue is supposed to work like a traditional pay TV that competitors like Comcast and Verizon provide, except that it’s delivered over the Web. Intel also plans on offering a couple of differentiating features, like a slicker user interface, and a cloud-based DVR that would automatically provide access to any program that had aired in the last 3 days, without requiring users to save a specific show.
But none of that will work without programming deals, or support from Intel’s top executives. A deal with Amazon or Samsung could theoretically bolster the service’s chances, by providing both cash and distribution.
Samsung is already a power in “smart” TVs, so you could imagine a scenario where Intel’s service comes bundled with the Korean company’s screens. And Amazon has already been spending heavily to build up a presence in Web video, and plans to roll out its own Web TV box later this year.
Courtesy: allthingsd

Retail stores become shipping hubs to battle Amazon

'Ship from Store' strategy saves money through shorter delivery routes.

Some of the world's largest retailers are turning their stores into mini distribution hubs to help them compete better online against Amazon.com.

Instead of fulfilling Web orders from warehouses hundreds of miles from shoppers' homes, companies including Wal-Mart, Best Buy and Gap are routing orders to stores nearby.

Store employees pick products from shelves, pack them into boxes and drop them into waiting FedEx and UPS trucks that zip off to homes a few miles away.

The trend, known as Ship from Store, saves money through shorter delivery routes. More important, it speeds deliveries, avoids costly markdowns and recoups sales that have been lost to Amazon, the world's largest Internet retailer.

"This is the most important thing that will change physical retailers over the next five years," said Matt Nemer, a retail industry analyst at Wells Fargo Securities.
AP Earns Best Buy
Shoppers walk toward the parking lot at a Best Buy store in Hialeah, Fla.(Photo: Alan Diaz, AP)
A network of large stores — with high overhead costs — has become a liability rather than an asset in recent years. Amazon, which has no stores, won market share with lower prices and huge selection. But retailers have begun fighting back by using technology to get more sales out of stores — and ship-from-store is a big part of the effort.

"Amazon has already beaten most retailers on price and selection. The third battleground is location and the smart retailers are not conceding that," said Tom Allason, founder of start-up Shutl, which helps retailers deliver online orders from stores.

Shutl's service covers most shoppers in the U.K., where the firm partners with retailers including Argos, Oasis and Karen Millen. The start-up is also in Manhattan and plans to expand soon to other big U.S. cities including Los Angeles, Miami and San Francisco.

Wal-Mart, the world's largest retailer, has been shipping online orders from some stores for about two years and about 35 stores do this now.

"We started ship-from-store as a test. It has exceeded every expectation we've had for it," said Neil Ashe, head of Global eCommerce at Wal-Mart. "We will probably scale this to hundreds of stores."

Already, 10% of the items ordered on Walmart.com are shipped from stores and the majority of those packages are delivered in two days or less, according to the company.

Two-thirds of the U.S. population live within five miles of a Wal-Mart store, so the company is using these locations as "nodes" in a broader distribution network that includes storage warehouses and specific fulfillment centers for online orders, Ashe explained.

Shipping from stores lets Wal-Mart offer faster delivery of online purchases "at very low cost," said Joel Anderson, president of walmart.com.

The retailer saves money on fees it pays to carriers such as FedEx and UPS because delivery distances from stores are much shorter.

The strategy is helping some retailers that until recently were left for dead by investors concerned about the competitive threat from Amazon.

Best Buy, the largest consumer electronics retailer in the U.S., was labeled a "Big Box Zombie" on the cover of Bloomberg Businessweek magazine last October. In December, the stock hit a decade-low of $11.20, valuing the company at less than $4 billion — about 3% of Amazon's market capitalization.

But Best Buy shares have more than tripled so far this year on optimism about a turnaround plan led by new Chief Executive Hubert Joly.

The plan focuses on "turning its store base from a cost liability to an offensive weapon," Gary Balter, an analyst at Credit Suisse, said.

A crucial part of this is ship from store, which Best Buy has rolled out in about 50 locations.

Best Buy's Joly sees it as a way to generate more online sales by avoiding situations where shoppers search for a product on its website and are told that it's not available.

Best Buy gets about 1 billion online visits a year and in 2% to 4% of those cases shoppers cannot buy products because they are out of stock in the company's e-commerce warehouses. But in 80% of those cases, Best Buy has the products in one of its physical stores.

"Unlocking this potential is an enormous opportunity," Joly said earlier this year.

Shipping online orders from Best Buy stores could generate an extra $5.8 billion in sales and $168 million in profit next year for the company, according to Balter's estimates.

Other retailers that have started doing this in recent years include Target, Nordstrom, Macy's, Lowe's, Gap, Dick's Sporting Goods, Ann Inc. and Finish Line.

Physical stores will play a crucial role in driving online sales in the future, says Doug Anmuth, an analyst at J.P. Morgan.

It's increasingly important as Amazon builds its own fulfillment centers closer to customers. In California, the company is constructing several giant warehouses one to two hours' drive from San Francisco and Los Angeles.

Amazon already delivers packages in two days for free through its popular Prime subscription. The company is also testing same-day and next-day delivery through its AmazonFresh grocery business in Seattle and Los Angeles — challenging retailers on location, as well as price and selection.

Wal-Mart and other big retailers hope that, by turning stores into shipping hubs for online orders, they can re-create Amazon's fulfillment network with the assets they already have.

"Some people talk about Amazon with their 100 distribution centers, God bless them. We have 2,600 distribution centers," said Gap Chief Executive Glenn Murphy, referring to the apparel retailer's network of Banana Republic, Gap and Old Navy stores.

Gap launched ship from store in 2012. The move has helped it deliver online orders faster, while avoiding situations where shoppers cannot find the right size or color of a particular garment.

Another big benefit: When stores have a lot of unsold products, online orders can be routed to locations with the most inventory. That helps limit costly discounts on unsold merchandise.

Wal-Mart and Best Buy also route online orders to stores that have the most inventory of a particular item.

Nordstrom started shipping online orders from its high-end department stores in 2009. It has helped the company maintain high levels of full-priced sales and get new fashions into stores quicker.

"There's profit margin enhancement to fulfill an online order in a store that is about to take a markdown on that item," said Wells Fargo's Nemer. "It sounds very promising."


Courtesy: USAtoday

Sep 27, 2013

Amazon, Apple face more international taxes in Europe

It's no day at the plage operating a giant, successful, multinational American company, once you've run up against some very un-American notions about tax policy from abroad. Such as the "data tax" on Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google, about to be proposed by France for adoption by the European Union.

Apparently, France would like to impose a data transmission tax on those companies -- and only those companies -- because they are the dominant platforms for Internet usage in Europe just as they are in the US, but they are "non-European," that is, American. Their dominance therefore prevents European competitors from emerging from obscurity. (How taxing the most popular sites will make other sites more popular with consumers is not clear.)

A French member of the European Parliament tells the Wall Street Journal that a data tax should be imposed because the European nations have become "just the puppets of financiers and multinationals."

Or, as Forbes puts it in a now-classic headline: "Gibbering Nonsense From France About Apple, Google, Facebook and Amazon."

The tax plan is just one piece of a proposal that would establish a new Internet regulatory agency within the European Union. In part, the agency would be empowered to impose other rules aimed at leveling the playing field for European competitors, such as forcing the American companies to enable portability among devices for digital purchases.

French Technology Minister Fleur Pellerin told the Wall Street Journal that the absence of such regulations is effectively "blocking innovation from all of the other actors," and making it difficult for European companies to emerge.

The call for regulation gets real impetus from another issue that has entangled US technology companies in Europe: data privacy. The issue gained a great deal of heat after revelations of the US government's continuing collection of private data on a massive scale, and with the cooperation of some of its biggest technology companies.

The proposals are expected to be presented in late October at a summit of European leaders.

At this point, the data transmission tax is the part of the proposal that seems least likely to succeed.

For one thing, it's not clear how such a usage-based tax could be imposed, though Pellerin told the Financial Times that her agency is looking at data transfer, traffic, and interconnection to work out how the big Internet companies make their money and, therefore, what part of their (free) services could be taxed.

In addition, it appears that Great Britain will oppose the idea, according to the British newspaper The Telegraph, not least because the European Union does not currently have the power to levy taxes.

The proposal appears to have the support of European telecoms, which have long resented the low tax rates enjoyed by American companies that are, after all, using the physical networks the telecoms built.

In an opinion piece for the Financial Times, British technology executive Joanna Shields argued that regulating the Internet would inevitably harm European startups as much as American businesses.

Courtesy: USAtoday


Powered by Blogger.

 

© 2013 Technology Update News!. All rights resevered. Designed by BDpython

Back To Top